It is quite easy to misunderstand my badly worded question. Frankly, you will get a better result on this kind of leg with 2 sided cutting on the table. There are some kluges you can do to get around this but I will not describe them here. With either approach, if the leg is very wide, you will run into vibration issues and may also have issues with bit length. If it isn't, it creates an ambiguous model in Aspire that will not render or cut properly. The biggest drawback with this method is that the center line of the leg has to be completely enclosed in the part (which it would not be in the example shown here). A harder way is to paste two halves together and then unwrap the resulting model (this can all be done from Aspire). The easiest way is to cut one side as shown in the picture, manually enter g-code to flip the part 180 degrees and reset the rotary to zero, and then cut the other side. ![]() The pictures below should give you an idea of what I mean.Īs far as doing these on the rotary, that is a challenge. In other words, your rails will define the curve and the sweep vector(s) will be one or more angles. ![]() This can be done, but you need to model it so that one of the corners are on the top.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |